Wing-tail configuration

Example simulation of a fixed-wing configuration

The wing-tail configuration has a wing aspect ratio AR=10AR=10, wing area Sref=0.3S_{ref}=0.3m2^2, wing chord cref=0.1732c_{ref}=0.1732m. Both the wing and the tail have a taper ratio of 1. The distance between the quarter-chord points of the wing and the tail is l=0.56l=0.56m. A body-fixed coordinate system is placed at the wing quarter-chord point. The reference speed is Vref=25|\mathbf{V}_{ref}|=25m/s and the reference density, pressure, and viscosity are evaluated at an altitude of h=0h=0m (ISA). An unstructured mesh with 6354 panels is used. The image below shows the pressure coefficient of the wing-tail configuration at an angle of attack α=5\alpha=5deg.

The lift, drag and pitching moment coefficients of the wing-tail configuration are assumed to be given by:

CX=CX0+CX,αα+CX,qˉqˉ+CX,δeδeCZ=CZ0+CZ,αα+CZ,qˉqˉ+CZ,δeδeCm=Cm0+Cm,αα+Cm,qˉqˉ+Cm,δeδe,C_{X}=C_{X0}+C_{X,\alpha}\alpha+C_{X,\bar{q}}\bar{q}+C_{X,\delta_{e}}\delta_{e}\\ C_{Z}=C_{Z0}+C_{Z,\alpha}\alpha+C_{Z,\bar{q}}\bar{q}+C_{Z,\delta_{e}}\delta_{e}\\C_{m}=C_{m0}+C_{m,\alpha}\alpha+C_{m,\bar{q}}\bar{q}+C_{m,\delta_{e}}\delta_{e} \text{,}

where qˉ=qcref2Vref\bar{q}=\frac{qc_{ref}}{2V_{ref}} is the normalised pitch rate. The CXC_{X}, CZC_{Z}, and CmC_{m} are functions of the the angle of attack α\alpha, the normalised pitch rate qˉ\bar{q} and the elevator deflection angle δe\delta_{e}. The aim is to obtain the CX0C_{X0}, CZ0C_{Z0}, and Cm0C_{m0} coefficients and the CX,αC_{X,\alpha}, CX,qˉC_{X,\bar{q}} , CX,δeC_{X,\delta_{e}}, CZ,αC_{Z,\alpha}, CZ,qˉC_{Z,\bar{q}}, CZ,δeC_{Z,\delta{e}}, Cm,αC_{m,\alpha}, Cm,qˉC_{m,\bar{q}}, and Cm,δeC_{m,\delta_{e}} derivatives using APM.

Obtaining the 0-coefficients

A simulation of the wing-tail configuration is performed at α=0\alpha=0 rad, p=0p=0 rad/s, δe=0\delta_{e}=0 rad. The values for the aerodynamic coefficients are recorded. They are the values of the 00- coefficients.

Obtaining the angle of attack and elevator deflection derivatives

As already discussed, a simulation of the wing-tail configuration is performed at α=0\alpha=0rad, p=0p=0 rad/s, δe=0\delta_{e}=0rad. The values for the aerodynamic coefficients are recorded. A second simulation of the wing-tail configuration is performed at α=0.1\alpha=0.1 rad, p=0p=0rad/s, δe=0\delta_{e}=0 rad. The choice of value for α\alpha is arbitrary. Again the aerodynamic coefficients are recorded. To obtain the α\alpha- derivatives a simple difference is used:

CZ,α=CZα=0.1CZα=0Δα,C_{Z,\alpha}=\frac{C_{Z}\rvert_{\alpha=0.1}-C_{Z}\rvert_{\alpha=0}}{\Delta\alpha}\text{,}

where Δα=0.1\Delta\alpha=0.1rad. The same method is used to obtain the δe\delta_{e}- derivatives.

Obtaining the pitch rate derivatives

The coordinate system used for the analysis above is fixed to the wing quarter-chord point however, this point does not coincide with the centre of gravity. If one determines the qˉ\bar{q}- derivatives with respect to this coordinate system they will not be representative of the qˉ\bar{q}- derivatives with respect to the centre of gravity. To determine the position of the centre of gravity (often driven by a required static margin), the neutral point position must be found. By definition, the stick-fixed neutral point position is where:

Cm,α=0.C_{m,\alpha}=0\text{.}

Using the difference method described above, the value of Cm,αC_{m,\alpha} is obtained for two different locations of the centre of gravity. The first location is when the centre of gravity coincides with the quarter-chord point of the wing xcg=0x_{cg}=0m and the second location is selected forward of the quarter-chord point of the wing xcg=0.05x_{cg}=0.05m. The choice of value for xcgx_{cg} is arbitrary. The equation for Cm,αC_{m,\alpha} as a function of xcgx_{cg} is then:

Cm,α=axcg+b2.0012=a0+b3.5526=a0.05+ba=31.028b=2.0012. C_{m,\alpha}=ax_{cg}+b\\ -2.0012=a0+b \\ -3.5526=a0.05+b \\ a=-31.028 \\ b=-2.0012 \text{.}

The solution of the equation gives xcg=0.0645x_{cg}=-0.0645, for Cm,α=0C_{m,\alpha}=0. This is the location of the stick-fixed neutral point, xnpx_{np}, (xnpx_{np}=xcgx_{cg} for Cm,α=0C_{m,\alpha}=0). The centre of gravity location for a 15% static margin is then given by:

SM=0.15=xcgxnpcrefxcgSM=0.1=xnp+0.15cref,SM=0.15=\frac{x_{cg}-x_{np}}{c_{ref}}\\ x_{cg}\rvert_{SM=0.1}=x_{np}+0.15c_{ref} \text{,}

with xcg=0.03852x_{cg}=-0.03852m. The qˉ\bar{q}- derivatives can now be obtained with respect to this point. A forced sinusoidal motion is imposed on the wing-tail combination:

α=Asin(ωt)ω=2πf,\alpha=Asin(\omega t) \\ \omega=2\pi f\text{,}

where A=5A=5deg is the amplitude of the motion and f=5f=5Hz is the frequency of the motion. The video below shows the development of the wing-tail configuration wake during the forced sinusoidal motion.

Wing-tail configuration wake development

The values of CmC_{m} with respect to α\alpha make a quasi-steady elliptical hysteresis. Two points exist at which the angular velocity is maximum or minimum. Cm,qˉC_{m,\bar{q}} derivative is estimated from the values of the CmC_{m} at these points

Cm,qˉ=CmqmaxCmqmin2kA,k=ωcref2Vref,C_{m,\bar{q}}=\frac{C_{m}\rvert_{q_{max}}-C_{m}\rvert_{q_{min}}}{2kA},\\ k=\frac{\omega c_{ref}}{2V_{ref}}\text{,}

where kk is the reduced frequency. The same method is used to obtain the other qˉ\bar{q}- derivatives. Below are the wing-tail configuration derivatives estimated by the method.

0_{0}

α\frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha}

qˉ\frac{\partial}{\partial \bar{q}}

δe\frac{\partial}{\partial \delta_{e}}

CXC_{X}

-0.0114

0.2555

-0.2491

-0.0195

CZC_{Z}

-0.3219

-5.1439

2.7170

-0.8377

CmC_{m}

0.0556

-0.9575

-20.0581

-2.3205

Files

Last updated